I found there was one April Fool RFC  this year after 5 days delay. :)
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4824.txt
It's a new encapsulation of IP protocol on top of a very traditional link layer. :)
Here is an excerpt from the clause 3.5 of the RFC.
|3.5.  Protocol Limitations
|
|   Due to the physical characteristics of the transfer channel, bit
|   error rates are expected to be in the range of 1e-3 (boy scout) to
|   1e-4 (professional sailor), and also depend a number of physical
|   factors.  Poor visibility due to weather conditions or lack of
|   illumination (e.g., night time) can drastically increase the error
|   rate.
Oh, well. I believe some African people can provide us extremely good quality transmission. Perhaps, error rate 1e-6 and extremely long distance? :o)
|   IP-SFS provides no means to handle frame reordering or dual
|   (multiple) frame reception.  Thus, the protocol is not suitable in
|   environments where interfaces are moving fast and/or when the path of
|   light is long.
In Japan, about 1800 years ago, there was a genius who can listen to 7 people simultaneously, and so probably he can be a multiplexor among people using IP over SFS. :)